Amongst the many quotes that your mate Miles Allens and co said that HAS given weight to the claim of crap models is what he stated to THE TIMES
“We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models. We haven’t seen that in the observations.”
http://www.independent.co.uk/enviro...ience-myles-allen-michael-grubb-a7954496.html
Or from the times the Environmental editor states
The study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, makes clear that rapid reductions in emissions will still be required but suggests that the world has more time to make the changes.
I think the recent headlines and captions are pretty accurate. The models are shite. Accept it and stop dancing around the edges sparra. It is no biggie to concede
FYI, the current modelling from the paper Allen et al paper NOW uses models labelled "RCP2.6 - 2017" Yep the new 2017 version
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Author of "warming not as bad as thought" paper fires back at denialists
Amongst the many quotes that your mate Miles Allens and co said...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)