AW1 General Chat, page-3079

That you keep responding makes its posts look legitimate. This is the folly of those who decide to engage with integrity.



You're questing the legitimacy of my posts which are mostly excerpts from presos and videos given by Dave O'Neill and Thomas Ullrich. We'll revisit them one by one over time which should make it easier to read...

Here's a couple that are related.

It certainly looks like they want next years results (that's 2025) included in their submission for a mining permit, I've underlined the important points!

RUI conf 7May24 DaveO’Neill; “if we can hopefully double this thing in the next year or two then that’s the project we want to permit”

Battery Commodity Dave O’Neill 14May24 - “we want to make sure we permit the right project and this one’s evolving very quickly so if we think it’s going to be bigger NEXT year then why would we permit todays one… “