Why would they breach an evaluation agreement with a third-party supplier prior to awarding a contract. There could be multiply suppliers involved in this process, who may legally not want their name known if they are unsuccessful.
AZL have already statement that SLB has already been involved. SLB could be the supplier of a DLE resin used in extraction, or they may be designing the DLE column apparatus, or the whole extraction and purification process, or they may not.
Maybe AZL doing a deal with the third-party to reduce their OPEX by licencing out the PLix resin?
At this stage, no one really knows yet, so stop your endless whining and wait.
Why would they breach an evaluation agreement with a third-party...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,948 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AZL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $80.52M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.8¢ | $77.03K | 4.187M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 29 | 5355804 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 540054 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AZL (ASX) Chart |