You initially said, "At least Lone Star's giving us a choice." I...

You initially said, "At least Lone Star's giving us a choice."

I asked - "And what choice exactly is that?" You haven't answered it.

All you've said thus far is that Lone Star should be given control because the current board has not done well enough for you.

This is a poor argument one because it makes no comparative assessment of what Lone Star are offering vs. what management are currently trying to do.

Strachan has answered that and has shown that they do not offer much at all as an alternative.

I'm not happy with the management of a few other stocks I currently hold, but that doesn't mean I would be happy to chuck out management to replace them with any Tom, Dick or Harry that builds up a mere 5% position in the company.

As far as I can see, Lone Star have not presented anything to compel me to believe that they could do better than what current management have achieved to date.