From that article we are just over 0.2 t CO2e/t LNG (I'd guess from the chart that it's 0.21).
This seems to align with the original articles "To qualify for benefits, LNG terminals will be required to keep emissions below 0.23 tons of carbon per ton of LNG.", making us unsurprisingly below the required limit. However the other two statements in the article, about 0.16 and the claim that "Global LNG facility emissions range from 0.18 to 0.27 tons per ton of the fuel" don't really seem to make sense. 0.16 seems unlikely as an achievable limit by anyone, and 0.18 to 0.27 seems likely to be way off given the details provided in the company's article show competitors in the 0.5 to 0.8 range (which is nowhere near 0.18 to 0.27).
LNG Price at posting:
$3.03 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
