Back to $3.50 by July?, page-12

It is this foggy aspect of a whispered takeover from one (two would mean "Bidding War!") that I believe explains the long v short battle. (Thanks nat.) One may assume the immediate point is to make money as risk free as possible.

I think it's the medium term that's at play in the short term. Shorting via several brokerages and even more accounts hides significant 5% positions needing to be disclosed. This, if true, then, can springboard into a t/o at the most; key BoD position(s) at worst. With the sp acting accordingly.

Also, and curious to, the shorts (they're down as of 21.1.16, 0.10%,) must pay any divvy to the owner of the borrowed shares. A surprise "Special Dividend" would cause a large short squeeze. This, though, would ruin the short plan and those behind it...

http://shortman.com.au/stock?q=pry

Yesterday I noted a downside risk of 15%, to put a finer point on it: 15% to 20%. That extra bit mostly is assigned by the effects of down outside markets. Clicking "Y" ==================>
shows the damage of many factors, notably shorts, and the worst they can do. Now click "M" =======>

With an initial position bought I'm looking for a bit of panic to BUY.

OV