back to the companies long term projects, page-11

sorry lautrec but you often further confuse things rather than making them clearer.

IMO it is not clear who is paying for the FS and design work / engineering dwgs etc as ashley stated we have a 50% stake in the JV through the FS / engineering / design phase up until construction. There are a few conflicting statements over various announcements. I will contact the company for clarification on the above.

imo some older esi announcements are also not valid, ie 2008 successful scale up to 150000Tpa. I think there is a bit in volved molving forward to get a 2mt plant up and then enabling the capability to upscale over time to 5 and 10mtp. This is where design and site specific FS studies are needed along withother external infrastructure requirements. I have explained in depth in past posts regarding how this might work. The study's economic component / buisness case would also suggest a 2mtp is not ideal, tincom will do financially best when at 5-10mtp. I have also coveered this in past posts indepth.

will we an interesting week watchjing the sp.

cheers