To attack the reputation of a director of a public company through inference, smear and innuendo or to make defamatory comments about companies and their directors is a path fraught with danger.
The following newspaper article regarding a cyber poison-penner attacking the reputation of a director of a public company over the internet and imagining that he was safe under the cloak of anonymity might be of interest to you;
Could it be argued that any person has been ''brought into hatred, contempt and ridicule and thereby suffered damage'' as a result of your recent postings on this thread?
Choose your words carefully.
Stagman
NKP Price at posting:
45.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
