Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"Come on man. That's not a neat hypothetical if you understood...

First 3471 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bennywizard

501 Posts.

52

09/09/21

14:34

Post #: 55948887
Share

Originally posted by DocMcstuffins: ↑

I absolutely wouldn't go a regularly administer that medication to patients base on one accidental administration.

That's not how medicine works.

Maybe if it was extremely convincing you would go and design a proper trial and go through an ethics board and go from there.

What if your gramma was on the ward with pneumonia. Some nurse accidentally gave her amiodarone, which is an anti-arrhythmic drug with serious potential side effects (pulmonary fibrosis, thyroid issues, etc ).

Now what if she recovered from pneumonia? The vast majority of people do. Would you say "oh it's not the antibiotics or the body healing itself, it's the amiodarone. let's keep giving that to her, to other patients.

Oh whoops, lots of pulmonary fibrosis in 10 years. How could we have prevented that?

Come on man. That's not a neat hypothetical if you understood anything about the scientific method.

Expand

"Come on man. That's not a neat hypothetical if you understood anything about the scientific method"

If you understood science and took the time to seach the evidence you'd be prescribing Ivermectin
Many thousnands of patients treated my many doctors world wide.
Doctors involved are way more qualified and experienced than GP's.

Dr.’s Kory, Marik etc
Check out FLCCC
6 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 5,341 more messages in this thread...

First 3471 Last

SPONSORED BY