If the USA deaths from the jabs are in the ball park of VAERS...

If the USA deaths from the jabs are in the ball park of
VAERS 16,000 x 10 underreported (100 historically )or
medicare server 48,000 (18.1%) x 5.5 (100%)/ injuries a multiple higher.

how many deaths would have alternatively been through the use of Ivermectin? Perhaps one the safest drugs over a 40 year history. Ivermectin does statistically next to no harm.

I accept that there is initially reduced risk of sever disease of cv19 from the experimental vaccines. But you need to roll that acute deaths and injuries dice from the jab before you get that benefit. While long term Harm still unknown

But you also need to roll that dice on each subsequent booster .
As the spike protein is a pathogenic part of the virus , is it safe or not safe to artificially flood the body
- have this free ranging in the cardiovascular system?
- crossing the blood brain barrier ?
while turning down the immune system to allow the spike factories to go unchallenged?

And now we are seeing big pharma come out with their own treatments? Experimental. For $$$$ because they recognise the futility in boosters of an extinct strain .

the previous post of Nebraskas attorney general makes the case for both Ivermectin and HCQ, available now with 40-65 years of safety data .