Background story to CV19 / HCQ and IVM treatments, page-52

  1. 27,119 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 3164
    Yes.
    except that most of the consumers are sheep, who simply follow what their tv tells them, and wont find true risk disclosures on the informed consent.

    Just think about this. Its an Experiment. There are no 8-10 year data to determine true efficacy. And they want to vaccinate children, or talking about it..Developing bodies, going through puberty. When they are the demographic least affected ?

    Why would you vaccinate an entire population ? with something with a growing risk profile ? What about these spike proteins pooling in ovaries ? Fertility ? If you cant see some kind or red flag waving about here?

    Why the rush on the entire population ? Before they figure out the true risk profile ?

    Given that most people will survive cv19, 99.8 % ? something like that. Yet risk all the population on an experimental vaccine.

    Something else to think about. Since the Nazis in WW2 did horrible medical experiments on prisoners, NEVER AGAIN, was there to be a forced medical treatment on anyone without their consent. True informed consent.
    And now they talk in some places about mandatory vax ? And what about that definition of being truly informed of the risks. eg. That these pathogenic toxic spike proteins, may be mobile, and travelling throughout your body. ? When did Pfizer find out ? The Japan study above ? This sort of thing, is why you have 8 years medical trials on small populations before you expose an entire world to it.
    Last edited by stevenjd: 08/06/21
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.