fg..."A very big difference yak. One is an act of war, the other a criminal act"
Good...we have movement at the station.
Now...I take your pt the airline thing is a criminal act....but the inherent nature of the suicide bomber is that there is no criminal to go get
Also, the sheer magnitude of the crime is important. Whilst even a murderer can kill many victims....when there are 1,000's of deaths from an act...the reponse is going to be different
So the next question....
If...after repeated acts or if there is a clear threat for repeats and if the perpetrators are off-shore, does the "victim" nation have the right to end the threat?