OK, I'll do it then.This is from God's Broker on ShareScene....

OK, I'll do it then.

This is from God's Broker on ShareScene. Haven't got his permission to do this, but figure he's already posted it on a public forum, and what he has found out is interesting to say the least, as Macrae alluded to on this thread.

"Hi guys,

I just received email from Prof John Moore (RE: The "Questions over Uranium Find" Article)

I basically asked him about the statements he has made regarding the find in Hakskeen. This is his reply:

Dear John,

I am afraid that I have been mis-attributed in this article. The reporter
phoned me, but I did not have any direct information regarding the Hakskeen
deposit.
He told me that the radiometric anomaly was reportedly related to thorium. I
then told him that if that was the case, then the anomaly could not be
related to carnotite in calcrete/gypcrete as carnotite does not contain
thorium. I then explained to him the nature of thorium anomalies - that
section is correctly attributed to me.
I told him that I visit the Rossing area (not Hakskeen area) on an annual
basis to show my students the difference between real and false uranium
anomalies.
All the references attributed to me regarding the nature of the Hakskeen
deposit and aerial anomalies are incorrect as I had no knowledge of the
geology of the area.

I therefore cannot help you in this regard and suggest that you contact Dr
Steven.

Regards
John Moore


Interesting isn't it....


I'm going to ask Dr Nick Steven now about his comments


What do you all think about this??? I'm impressed for one that John Moore actually replied, but further to that, that he actually indicated his comments were severely slandered!




I'll keep digging!"