Really? give me a break... we must have very kind managers in Doyle and Fabian, buy a plot of land for $12 million - partly paid, exchange that for 84 million shares in RVE and voila we have a $250million valuation for the company. If the mine was worth anything it wouldn't of been up for sale at $12million in the first place, and then let me get this right...
[pre prospectus, RVE had from memory $3million in cash for 32 million shares (post consolidation)
$15million was raised through the SFZ prospectus for 42million shares.
$18million for 74million shares or 24cents per share.
issue 84million shares to SAFM holdings for the asset.
$18million for 158million shares or 11.4cents per share in cash. Consideration for the asset would hence be valued at $20million. Effectively, an $8million gain in the value of the asset from initial purchase.]
So here it is, the big question... why did SAFM holdings dilute their stake in the asset from 100% to 53%?
another question... so if SAFM holdings lost 47% of their stake in the asset, then why did Fabian's baker steel resource fund enjoy a 20% gain in their stake in SAFM holdings in November? (upon relisting of RVE, Baker steel and other owners of SAFM holdings would of been up 54%)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SFZ
- baker steel resources trust limited
baker steel resources trust limited, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SFZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online