doesn’t it seem a bit contradictory that they would be doing a buyback to give “their mates ie the large investor” an opportunity to exit but then screw them over by not placing enough on the buy side to allow them to exit at a higher price?
in another parallel universe I can imagine us arguing how bad a buy back was cos they purchased everything at 1.5c, letting a large investor mate exit, with the SP now sitting at 1c…
Banter and General Comments .. BRK, page-12057
Add BRK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.11M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $23.05K | 2.183M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | 25833994 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 54460586 | 48 |
| Last trade - 13.57pm 15/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRK (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable