Banter and General Comments, page-16937

Yes, at the beginning a binding contract would be signed agreeing to what both parties agree to.

However,

The demand may be retched up, (after the signing of the binding contract) so as to encourage the supplier to expand?

The consumer may always sustain the demand relating to the binding contract, it’s the margin of demand above that, that maybe withdrawn after the signing of the loan to the producer, if the producer chooses to go into debt in order to feed the consumer’s extra demand?

That appears to be the trap?

May be also more of question for the legal eagles if this is, or been done in this way?

Else-wise, the consumer may say, “If you can not supply me with more, I may have to get it somewhere else?”

Then the Knight in $Green shining armor appears over the crest, “look, I can lend you the money!”

Then we can all live happily ever after, well, at least one of us can!