I have already refuted your arguments. You are basing your...

I have already refuted your arguments. You are basing your arguments largely on things the company has said, which, as history has shown, are hardly worth the paper they are written on.. I can list many things that the company has said that have not eventuated.

So my posts lack substance and I'm "peddling wares".. Hmmm.. I remember the last quarterly and the quarterly before that I was predicting an ugly report and was smashed by holders on here for lacking any truth and substance.. And surprise, surprise - those quarterlies were absolute turds and the share price was spanked accordingly.

On the other hand, holders who said those quarterlies couldn't be bad and attempted to justify why were hailed with a stack of "Likes" even though the facts now prove that they were the ones who indeed lacked any substance and truth.