Go for it! Shine bright like a diamond.Debating for ticks (as...

Go for it! Shine bright like a diamond.

Debating for ticks (as the only payment) isn't a wise use of my time or yours I'd submit.

If I put my thoughts on the record (even in long form) - I can check back later - so that's part of why I do it - I can check what I thought and when later - bugger all others will though.

If expertise was measured on the basis of predictive performance a lot of my posts prior to the second CRL should have been discovered and ticked for predictive value. They could still be pulled out and argued with on technical detail (respectfully that might help you deepen your science allowing you to put Silviu on the spot with some good questions ahead of or in an AGM if you choose to do that - I don't expect you to do it - but my argument has always been - to you and to LED - that no-one including me owns science understanding - its hard to get but it doesn't spin if one puts the time in and its potentially empowering to have it). Didn't really happen (people reviewing my old posts). Pfeifer took a look and reposted some brief summaries. Mostly the dogs bark and the caravan moves on. And overwhelming people sort of take the bribes - eg CYP shareholders vote for dills to get options if they get some too. A sort of communal face planting in the shareholder seed capital by directors and those willing to re-agree to the directors continuing.

In this forum the like button is like sugar hits for kids - the kids are traders - like bedger (but a lot of others) - they are superficial and looking for the swing. Nothing inherently wrong with that (its irksome when a bunch of psychological advice is given when its never asked for and is off-topic and irrelevant - that is a bedger specialty in my experience the unsolicited offtopic personal advice - but one doesn't get like ticks for taking candy away from kids or spoiling the sale of lemons between lemon traders.