@DocMcstuffins
A specialist at obfuscation, wherever deemed necessary, by we.
My response is read my first sentence then read my last. So I can be slightly convinced you might, here they are
For me it is a balance of probabilities.
For me it is not an appeal to authority, it is information from authorities that carries weight.
As others have responded, there was always going to be another trial.
On another point, your first, do you honestly believe the FDA would respond with a question requiring post hoc analysis of data they too have if they had no idea? It seems weird to me if they did not already have maybe just an inkling of the answer if not the same output. Don't they have staff to examine all data supplied, to look for incorrect statistical treatment or analysis? Just maybe from time to time the FDA might find something interesting to them, of possible value, to the extent they might ask respondents if they want (to spend more time and money) to follow it through, see what happens, via a leading question.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MSB
- banter and General Discussion
banter and General Discussion, page-4016
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6,561 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
98.0¢ |
Change
0.020(2.08%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.118B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
97.0¢ | 99.5¢ | 97.0¢ | $1.124M | 1.146M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 140787 | 97.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
98.0¢ | 37051 | 19 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 140787 | 0.975 |
14 | 141637 | 0.970 |
10 | 284497 | 0.965 |
11 | 137812 | 0.960 |
4 | 36600 | 0.955 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.980 | 35489 | 19 |
0.985 | 48469 | 15 |
0.990 | 98339 | 12 |
0.995 | 139335 | 16 |
1.000 | 142387 | 11 |
Last trade - 11.38am 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MSB (ASX) Chart |