Hmmm. Sounds an awful lot like you are trying to run with the...

Hmmm.

Sounds an awful lot like you are trying to run with the foxes while hunting with the hounds. You promote the anti-Metgasco movement through your affiliation with protest groups, and then feel justified in suggesting what should happen with the money after the company has been run out of town by people like yourself? Interesting sentiment, whether a shareholder or not. Fact is, Metgasco's only business was in the Northern Rivers, so, what on earth could have prompted you to buy into something you seem so fundamentally opposed to? An opportunity to make money, at the expense of your own credibility? A belief in the company, just "not in your backyard"? A chance to vote and feel more empowered? Who knows. Perhaps you could elaborate on your initial motives through until now, just to validate your stance for us all? You are right though... If you do hold, you have the right to speak your mind. Given the recent events, however, and your active role in promoting anti-csg sentiment, it would seem to many on here that you do not have the moral authority to say much at all. After all, you have shown your hand, and it has come up a murky shade of green. But hey, that is the sort of thing MEL has been up against all this time, right?

Good luck with your 7 cents. Hopefully it will give you a chance to move on quietly.

Your friendly neighbourhood shareholder,

AP