"BTW I looked at the report. Here is part of the executive...

"BTW I looked at the report. Here is part of the executive summary.
"This analysis therefore not only charts a possible path for energy use and CO2 emissions in 2021 but also highlights the many factors that could lead to differing outcomes. "

Comprehension failure, my little stalker (how many times is it that you've declared you are putting me on ignore?), because that sentence explicitly refers to a "possible path for energy use" in the year 2021.

Read it again.
See?
"...in 2021"

But what the discussion is self-evidently about is not just 2021 (heck, who cares about 2021? We're already have way done with it), but over the medium- to longer-term.


"Woow! That post takes smarminess[*] to the next level. Most amusing."

Just citing the work of the scientists, li'l stalker. None of my own assumptions; just the scientists'.
What's wrong? Don't you like the science?

.