unusual term......bashers and pumpersit comes from ones...

unusual term......bashers and pumpers

it comes from ones perspective i guess....but at the end of the day a reader can only measure the contribution of a poster by results.

This is the ONLY factual way to determine if a poster has any value or their input is well resourced.

The facts as we know them today.

I have said repeatedly LOOK is NOT a buy.

I have said repeatedly LOOK had inherent problems and would miss its Q4 guidance.

IT DID

I said LOOK would have a bigger loss in Q1 then in Q4 on lower revenues.

IT DID

I said the share price would fall.

IT DID

I said LOOk would have lower revenues quarter over quarter.

I WAS CORRECT

Now....

you have said LOOK

Is a "strong buy" since it was trading at $2.50

YOU WERE WRONG

YOU said LOOK would beat its Q4 guidance.

YOU WERE WRONG

You said LOOK would beat its Q1 guidance.

YOU WERE WRONG

You said LOOK would be $10 by June.

YOU WERE WRONG


so Ross.....

if you were just a reader of this site.....and had to make an judgement of who was making the correct calls on LOOK.....

you would have to say i have been 100% correct and you have been 100% wrong!!!!!

Therefore.....my research and knowledge of LOOK is 100% better then yours.

The facts do speak for themselves.