basic reason, page-9

Mavbe so Clark to show what we have. Remember our wells have been drilled deeper more than our surrounding neighbours into the Cline and the Strawn formations which according to Pioneer and Laredo are to be touted as prolific producers to come.

SG has done the hard yards testing these for Hori program with the help of Haliburton and are very impressed with the results. What does that say.???

SRH 1 and 2 flowed prolificly on production with high rates and he could not pick which one is better. SRH 1 we know flowed 379 in a day test and before being shut in flowed nearly 1200bs in the 3 or 4 days. Did SRH 2 do the same as we werent told its rates but from an earlier report was very high in gas. Still saying they dont know which is the better one.

Hazio the other day reports in tha Chris has said most of the early oil came from the CLINE. At that stage the Sprayberry Dean interval being done now and im guessing part of the Wolfcamp werent fracced and produced from.

The Clie fracced initially but was the whole of the Upper and Lower Wolfcamp included????? Add the Sprayberry Dean to the list, what would you have for a flowrate from the whole well of SRH 1. Start from 379 bs+, 500/600 or more.

It was also shut in to save the integrity of the well of what we had to flow from. Every interval was individually tested and why.???? Would you do it to an ordinary producer.????

These are multi stacked play wells and potentially will be big producers, so why not see what you have and treat with kidgloves. Now you can tell the world you have wells that can 500+bs/d, 4 times the PB average VERT well and they can be HORI-FIED at differebt intervals.

Add the 3D seismic program to the list of the above and a 110 well program to boot, what have you got.???

Its an AAA class rilling program, wouldnt a potential JV partner want to hear that.?????