Much of what you guys say is true; however the left field bottleneck issue is AT and the way the State/s and/or the NRC will treat the permitting of its use, all assuming of course it works at commercial scale.....
I wonder if the impressive list of people you've mentioned above are in any way prepared to address this issue. Based on ADAMS literature as recent as a week ago it would appear they're not even thinking about it....the NRC is contacting AT to find out what the heck is going on, and specifically mention in this correspondence that it appears they need a SML to Ablate the ore. So the NRC officers are of the opinion that a SML may be necessary.
This is one of the left field events the could potentially shelve all those grand plans, and it leads me to believe that Azarga's strategy now is beginning to account for this reality - diversify "the company" (including the legacy BLR) to the point they are no longer reliant on Hansen resource mined by UBHM and Ablation to stay afloat.
I've said enough on this issue now, and I'm sure most will be relieved to see the back of me relating to this topic. Make up your own minds about the risk associated with continuing to invest in BLR.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?