Unsurprising. No doubt costs are not awarded due to the public interest nature of the claim, no matter how tenuos the claim.
Strangely enough this public interest argument is often found in the Family Court where shy applicant has nothing to fear about costs orders.
I wonder if F & B will be back to oppose the expansion of the escarpment mine on the grounds that the hew ground is different from the approved ground.
good luck all
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- bathurst seeking costs
Unsurprising. No doubt costs are not awarded due to the public...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BRL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
70.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $133.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 4689 | 63.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
69.5¢ | 51 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 4689 | 0.635 |
1 | 299 | 0.600 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.695 | 51 | 1 |
0.710 | 20689 | 1 |
0.735 | 10000 | 1 |
0.740 | 4357 | 1 |
0.750 | 5000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.14pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BRL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable