Unsurprising. No doubt costs are not awarded due to the public interest nature of the claim, no matter how tenuos the claim.
Strangely enough this public interest argument is often found in the Family Court where shy applicant has nothing to fear about costs orders.
I wonder if F & B will be back to oppose the expansion of the escarpment mine on the grounds that the hew ground is different from the approved ground.
good luck all
Unsurprising. No doubt costs are not awarded due to the public...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
70.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $133.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4689 | 63.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 69.5¢ | 51 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.14pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable