bb is ba, page-130

one more thing george anticipating a response that doesnt listen....

im told the jorc and any resource estimation uses statistics...it doesnt only apply to native copper or nuggety gold....if there is a relatively small population of really high grade numbers they get cut...be it massive nuggets of chalcopyrite or native copper or anything....if there is a significant population of high grade say 20% then it will be included..the smaller population of say 50% would be cut...simple and standard stats.

nugget effect means you can get really high grade zones but right next door you might get nothing...hence to get statistical average you tend to need more samples. LM has a pretty tight drill spacing so im going with the jorc being the best estimate....maybe plus or minus 10 or even 20% (and that is plus or minus!)

So those rampers suggesting its going to be plus 100s of percents (ie 4% rather than 1% (which is several hundred percent discrepancy) are either blatant rampers or dont understand basic stats...

That is why it annoys me the co is happy for the myth to be spread without attempting to prove or disprove it with the most modern of scientific techniques that the jorc uses..

xx