It was a strange article...and was obviously taken as a positive...

It was a strange article...and was obviously taken as a positive by the market. When deals are getting close to the wire, investment banks try to pump things up IMO...fake leaks, etc. But this was strange...impression that possibly only one party still in negotiation and balance was dumping on the company (ie stating the the known negative facts).

So perhaps it is a genuine leak...down to the wire with one player...do they want to deal with the banks pre 31 July or the administrator thereafter?