Hi slimw, perhaps it would do us good to ponder six implications...

Hi slimw, perhaps it would do us good to ponder six implications or behind-the-scenes-play that come to mind:
1. When GS says buy or sell, we suspect that we might be better of acting just the opposite. Well, some have likened MQG as the little GS.
2. Not all analysts are of the same calibre. Or have the same depth of interest in all quoted shares. Some might be under pressure to produce reports (even mediocre ones?) for the sake of producing reports to meet their KPIs.
3. Arrogance and cheap ego trip. Have you had the bemusing experience of a broker/analyst talking down at you? I have and was bemused. It was all about him needing to feed his own ego. Expensive suit, tie and patent leather shoes do not a noble man maketh. Mentally gave him the finger and made note of his full name for useful future reference.
4. Should we believe that MQG knows BDR's operations better than Atomic, JID et al? What could they clarify to us that would be missed by our in-house helpful posters.
5. A few posters (not you, of course) have doubted Atomic, JID et al and cast aspersions. Would same posters doubt MQG? If not, then why not?
6. For peer comparison purposes, other credible analysts' price targets for BDR shares and timeframes should shed more light for us.

More smoke and mirrors, or does MQG know something significant about BDR that BDR should be disclosing to ASX? Cheers, R.