re: law council slams howard's scam. Why bend over backwards to accommodate the recalcitrant defence lawyers? If they do not deem it appropriate to submit to vetting for a security clearance, they should be excused from representing their client and lawyers who are willing to get a security clearance appointed for the defence.
re: law council slams howard's scam. Why bend over backwards to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)