I know about the ore body apparently not having enough overburden to be removed in contrast to VMY as an excuse given but anyone or company who gets into a law binding contract especially with the government and apparently doesn't know how to fulfill that obligation they signed up for deserves every bit of verbal disdain they are currently getting.
They should have known back when it was first implemented exactly what it would take to fulfill the terms and conditions of the contract and quickly adhered to what is needed to surpass the requirement, Seeing they knew back then stripping overburden wasn't going to happen they should have made plans and kept in-touch with the mine minister asking what extra steps it would take to settle the requirement.
My opinion only
Been Down So Long, page-183
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 160 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TOE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
26.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(5.45%) |
Mkt cap ! $31.27M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 27.5¢ | 27.5¢ | 26.0¢ | $42.56K | 157.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8286 | 26.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 27.5¢ | 164340 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 11/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TOE (ASX) Chart |