I'm just looking at the picture. But in other articles it is stated as being a few metres above sea level.
Rudd's 63 years old. He and is wife have a range of properties and investments. I'm sure he'll enjoy it while it lasts, or his wife will flick it for an investment gain to some fossil fuel advocate. But going by the picture he wouldn't be affected by the expected sea level rise in his life time. Anyone suggesting this as an argument of hypocrisy or falsity of climate science is grasping at straws.
