Otherperspective wrote: (in bold - you can see this its still there! All I have done below is cut and paste from his post, bold the text so it stands out as being what he said and add some yellowing to the word granted.)
Mesoblast have a US patent granted on Composition of Matter that encompasses all types of Mesenchymal Cells , regardless of type, including InducedPluripotent, which lasts until 2032 with extensions out to 2037Now I write this to you because I understand that you are a person that can be logical (I tag
@Pledge also because he can be logical and he has a good BS detector which he tends to apply in every direction including towards me and including towards otherperspective).
Whether a patent is merely applied for or granted in the United States is not a matter of opinion it is a matter of fact. You, pledge, anybody reading this can see otherperspective asserted the existence of a granted patent. But I found so far only an applied for patent.
So the question is - to otherperspective or to anyone that cares about the distinction between a granted patent or a merely applied for one, which I would suppose is about a clear a distinction as a granted BLA or a merely applied for one, is what is true?
It is not necessary to trust anyone here it is only necessary to investigate whether the patent application I linked to is actually the same one otherperspective mistakenly took for granted, or whether I am mistaken that it is merely applied for and not granted - but in any case that is completely determineable by using the internet and checking the patent office.
Cheering the evasion of a matter of fact question must dumb down discussion aimed at discovery of the truth. If basic facts like is a patent granted or not in the US, is otherperspectives statement which doesn't specify any particular reference actually has a true reference can't be agreed on here then its pretty hopeless to expect common sense in any form to have a chance here either.
When LED appeals to common sense such an appeal if every meaningful elsewhere is not validly appealed to in a forum where what is common sense is determined on the like button count irrespective of whether it is factually true or not.
(20min delay)