You've mentioned similar things before GC like that.... - 'Your...

You've mentioned similar things before GC like that.... - 'Your persistent referral to past statistics is stale and relevant only to the trials that make up those statistics'

I've kind of ignored it before because i thought you must be joking. Apparently not.

Have you ever heard of the theory of probability?
Ever looked at a graph and seen a trend?
Ever thought to yourself, "Hmmm, each time I hit myself on the head with that rubber mallet it hurts. Perhaps I better not do it again?"
Ever thought..'Hmmmm the latest sharemrket activity looks like Neu is "set for a run".

All those things are based on statistics GC. Statistics by definition are from data from the past and they tell you things about how likely something is to occur. It isn't a crystal ball, but it can tell you how likely a particular event is to occur. Some people use that information to learn from their mistakes and get better at what they do. Those people tend to make a lot money from the other people that keep belting themselves on the noggin over and over again thinking that what has gone on before has no predictive value about what might happen next. Panadol GC?