Bang on CS. People are confusing a relationship between Bergen and failed borrowers with a causal relationship. They would just as likely have failed if anyone else had lent them funds.
The difference is Bergen, by their own admission, lend to and invest in high growth and high risk businesses. That is why they are associated with more failed companies.
You may liken it to blaming a doctor in palative care for the death of his/her patients. If the patients are terminal, they are going to die regardless of how good or bad the doctor is so you can't use mortality rate as an indicator of the doctors ability
Bang on CS. People are confusing a relationship between Bergen...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 147 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AUZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.18M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | $18.49K | 2.311M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | 4996323 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 2511425 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AUZ (ASX) Chart |