I appreciate your research and your reply, however the comments you have provided still do not illustrate the cartoonish insults Australian has traded with China as aspoused by" one of Australia's most highly respected investigative journalists" in the opening piece. This has been a one way trade. Calling one of our own politicians, where there was clearly suspicion of his involvement with the regime, Shanghai Sam is not a cartoonish insult to China but is more an illustration of the Aussie humour.Radio shock jocks........ really?You did provide more evidence of China's views.As I said previously, a one way trade. I stand by my original statement and believe I have responded with a rational argument and as for hard data and supporting evidence we both know there is plenty available in the public space on this matter.
