Well the author is not only a public coward, but he has used...

Well the author is not only a public coward, but he has used implied understandings- which are not necessarily true or widely beleived - in order to fool readers into feeling as though theres an alliance out there with the myth based concensus mind you.

Then he goes on to say that he wants a balanced view, which is hilarious. The guy has clearly premeditated the wording in the letter so as to convey nothing other than his own constructions and innuendo, as a way to create further confirmation bias (which we all know is blind to views other than the one you wish to convey).
As i said, he then goes on to say, at the very end that he wants objectivity, in a feeble attempt to wash over all the blatantly biased ridicule - which is all he has done.
Essentially, it is character vilification and I would say it wont be around for too long if the author get winds of certain laws.

I notice that even if people have replied to the author, he offers no mode for response on his website, which further illustrates his despise of of any ligitimate hole-picking response.

I'd say it mpore than a website by now, I'd say it now a documtent. Good luck to the guy for his stupidity, only the depth will vary from here lol.

Cheers,

Lautrec