Of course government funds science studies - it's not a...

  1. 2,880 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 372
    Of course government funds science studies - it's not a financially profitable activity in its own right, therefore private investment is lacking. To play devil's advocate, if a private company is funding research, then there is far more reason to question the integrity. Why do you think petroleum companies spend so much money lobbying government in this regard? I know a lot of PhD academics, and your first comment is completely incorrect. There definitely are situations where your second sentence plays true - regarding consultancies proving a pre-determined outcome. But that applies to justifying government investment (e.g. infrastructure) rather than research, from my experience.

    I agree that clearing an existing vegetated forest to install a utility scale solar farm is not sustainable. But the optimal use case of an EV is for residential rooftop solar to charge cars - reducing the strain on the grid. Outback solar helping power mining projects is a great use case too. So many uninformed people roll out the same "oh but lithium batteries are bad" argument when it comes to EVs. I'd encourage them to actually research a whole-of-life embodied carbon assessment (including all lifecycle stages) before heading to the keyboard.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
$36.86
Change
-0.440(1.18%)
Mkt cap ! $187.1B
Open High Low Value Volume
$36.84 $37.00 $36.69 $426.3M 11.56M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 10 $36.81
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$36.87 1323 2
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
BHP (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.