This is hilarious. You are blatantly missing the point - I feel deliberately. A rather critical key word is "majority". Are you going to claim that there is equal scientific evidence for and against climate change? That is my entire point. Everything I've seen shows the vast majority of informed scientists supporting the fact that human consumption is influencing climate change.
Now you're just going off tangentially. I said I agree that government is guilty of using consultants to show pre-determined outcomes. My whole argument is that your application of this to scientific studies is flawed. There is a huge difference between modelled projections (what consultants do), and scientific analysis of past evidence (what scientists do). You appear to not be able to distinguish these two.
BHP was one of my first ever investments and will always remain a large portion of my portfolio. Again, for the fifth time you're making up arguments. To quote me from a few posts ago "I'm happy for BHP to stay out of lithium". Geez you love arguing with yourself!
p.s. lithium share prices are actually quite high if you compare that to ~2018 or so.
BHP Price at posting:
$36.86 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)