thisisjamo. I disagree that the J/V Agreement would force them to participate. In many J/Vs participants would not have the legal right to withdraw until the objects of the J/V had been met.
But with the J/V to explore WA-290-P what is the J/V's objective? Is it to drill 1,2 or ten wells? Drilling each well would be a J/V on it's own. For example "After technical review of available data, Tap elected not to proceed ...
http://www.tapoil.com.au/irm/content/annualreport/split/4.BusinessReview.pdf
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- bianchi-1 zola appraisal
thisisjamo. I disagree that the J/V Agreement would force them...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TAP (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online