Let me respond directly and firmly to your comment — because quite frankly, I think you’ve completely missed the point of what I shared.
You’ve chosen to focus on the acronym SATAN in the most shallow way possible, as if the video or I were suggesting that the experimental program itself is the devil. That’s not the point. The point — which was clearly made in the transcript — is the disturbing choice to label something that is literally tampering with God’s creation using a name that so blatantly aligns with a character known throughout history and Scripture as a deceiver and destroyer.
Now you may write that off as coincidence or meaningless, but some of us aren’t so quick to shrug off red flags. Some of us ask why names like SATAN are used. Especially when they’re tied to programs that propose spraying reflective chemicals into the stratosphere — which they admit will affect seasons, crop growth, rain patterns, and more.
If that doesn’t at least warrant a raised eyebrow, then yes, I’d say your head is in the sand.
You also chose to write off the entire video and my post as just “conspiracy theorist nonsense” — without addressing any of the serious concerns raised. That’s convenient. But it also makes me seriously wonder if you even watched the full clip. The concerns in the video were based on documented plans and real-world trials already underway. That’s not “conspiracy.” That’s happening. Right now.
And by the way, many things that were once labelled “conspiracy theories” — digital ID tracking, social credit systems, media censorship, and vaccine injuries — have now either been proven true or are openly discussed in mainstream policy documents. So maybe the issue isn’t that I’m “misleading the gullible.” Maybe it’s that too many people blindly trust whatever narrative is fed to them, while mocking those who still ask questions.
Remember COVID? Governments and big pharma told people to keep lining up for shot after shot — and now we’re seeing the real toll. Heart issues. Nervous system disorders. Immune dysfunction. But still, people trust the same systems without hesitation. And when you question it — you get labelled a conspiracy theorist. That should tell you something.
You don’t have to agree with everything I share, but don’t pretend there’s no validity in questioning what’s being rolled out globally. I posted the video because it highlights where governments and corporations are openly pushing toward digital control, bio-surveillance, and planetary engineering. What we saw during COVID was just a taste — what’s coming will make it look like a holiday.
So if you want to ignore the bigger picture and reduce the conversation to “a non-existent vile character called Satan,” that’s your call. But don’t accuse me of misleading anyone when all I’ve done is share verifiable content with real-world consequences that everyone has the right to examine for themselves.
Are you the kind of guy who laughs at those trying to help you? People knocking on your door to warn you of something real — like a tidal wave coming that will wipe out the town, or a meteor about to hit the ocean so hard the aftershock will devastate every coastal area around you — and yet you scoff?
You turn on the news, and the mainstream media says, “Don’t panic, everything’s fine.” And you trust the talking heads instead. You don’t even stop to ask why people were warning you in the first place. You don’t research, don’t question — you just smirk, mock the concerned voices, and brush it off because some polished anchor on Channel 9 said it’s under control.
Meanwhile, others are packing their families and heading inland.
Five hours later — the tidal wave hits.
And you’re gone.
See, sometimes warnings come from the voices least expected — and they don’t always come with flashing lights or government approval. But wise people ask questions. They investigate. They don’t mock others just because the warning didn’t come from an "official source."
Truth is, too many people today are so busy mocking those who see the signs that they end up blindsided by the very thing they refused to consider.
