Hi Brett
Imugene have fantastic management, and they run a really tight ship, for example since from the time the new management have been runing them ( other than a certain former director who left and sold millions of shares ) I have never seen a single announcement that has raised a red flag.
i.e they have always dotted the i's and crossed the t's, to such an extent that I was willing to assume that the director was selling for other reasons, and not that he had a problem with the science of IMU.
Anyway's IMU have always got the nuts and bolts stuff right such as "getting their accounts done on time".
As I said they run a tight ship, companies that can't get that stuff right to me anyway raise red flags
I would perhaps think about that if I were you
incidently the ex director who sold millions of shares then went back on market and purchased back far more than he sold.
Kind regards FP
Shares Held (listed by order of value held)
ASX IMU, NZX SKO, NZX PEB, NZX TRU, NZX SKL, NZX MHJ, NZX BLT, NZX ERD
Epilogue:
The following epilogue has been written IMOHO and is for those who are new to IMU that are arriving daily on this forum, if that’s you? Then to you I give a warm welcome.
Although my following views are intended to be helpful they do come with a few words of warning;
If you’re a holder in IMU: It’s going to feel like forever for the reward to come, and you had better have a good stomach to handle the highs and the lows of this roller coaster share.
If you’re not a holder in IMU: Although I’m sure that in many years’ time IMU will still be a great company to invest in, It will feel like no time at all before the opportunity of getting in at ridiculously low valuations has passed by.
Although by no means exhaustive I have set out below 10 reasons why at least 1 top 20 shareholder takes a positive long term view of Imugene.
1: Humble, yet highly renowned board of directors (including a strategic partnership with Vienna medical university) and highly experienced competent management team.
2: The creation of a method to manufacture what is considered to be the world’s first commercially viable polyclonal “B cell” cancer Vaccine (Her-Vaxx) and a B cell Mimotope technology platform.
3: Mimotopes are peptides that mimic the effects of specific B-cell epitopes in stimulating an immune response. Immunization with such mimotopes would be expected to induce a B cell immune response directed at the target disease related antigen. As such they have great utility as potential immunotherapeutic approaches for various cancers in much the same way as HER-Vaxx is being used to stimulate an immune response to the tumour antigen HER2 in breast or gastric cancer.
4: Outstanding IP: The Method of producing the B cell Mimotope peptide vaccines is patented; competitors need to find an alternative method to manufacture their B cell peptides.
5: Imugenes B cell Mimotope vaccines are Polyclonal and are considered to be considerably more potent than the monoclonal T cell vaccines which they replace. Imugenes polyclonal mimotope B cell vaccines invoke one’s own B cells to make your own antibodies therefore they have less chance of triggering autoimmune diseases, as is the case with the existing synthetically produced monoclonal T cell antigens.
6: This technology allows Imugene to add to and grow its own platform; in part IMU could do this by mimicking many other existing monoclonal antibodies and make polyclonal equivalents of them (these could include drugs such as Opdivo (marketed by BMS) and Keytruda (marketed by Merck). Sales reported for Opdivo and Keytruda in 2017 were USD4.95b and USD3.81b respectively and have double digit annual growth, for example by year 2022 Opdivo is expected to reach sales of USD10b).
7: Potentially disruptive Technology- Imugenes polyclonal antibody response is expected to be considerably safer than T cell drugs, therefore the T cell drugs which it replicates are likely to have greater restrictions applied to their use, or be pulled from market.
8: Technology like this has potential for many billions of dollars in sales. Typically licencing agreements pay the developer an upfront payment and/or milestone payments at a later date, then depending upon the size of those payments, also make yearly royalty payments which are typically agreed at a figure of between 10% and 20% on sales, (in some cases I have heard of royalty payments to be as high as 60%).
9: Of that revenue generated a Biotech Company’s management decide how much to keep for administration and R&D with the balance remaining usually returned to shareholders. In this sector costs (compared to revenue) are typically low so shareholder pay-out ratios are often high (typically in the 80 to 90% range).
For example: each $1b in product sales could return the following:
$1Bilion of sales at a 20 % royalty = $200 million revenue pa.
20% of the $200m = $40m pa for administration & R&D (= sustained growth!)
80% of the $200m = $160m pa for dividend distribution
$160m is divided by issued capital (IMU has almost 3 billion shares) = 5.3 cents
That’s 5.3 cents per share dividend for each 1 billion of product sales alone! additional to that there would probably also be upfront, and potentially down the track, milestone payments as well, for example (before deducting company running costs) an upfront or milestone payment of $500m equates to an additional 16.6 cents per share.
10: With each $1b of royalty sales potentially generating around 5.3 cents in dividends, it’s easy to see how someday $10b (or more!) of sales could potentially generate shareholders around 53 cents (or more!) per share in dividends, while at the same time making a large and positive difference for a lot of patients.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- IMU
- Bidding war for IMU
Bidding war for IMU, page-90
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 81 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
5.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $382.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
5.2¢ | 5.3¢ | 5.1¢ | $525.2K | 10.13M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 92800 | 5.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.3¢ | 1045565 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 70000 | 0.052 |
31 | 3304831 | 0.051 |
67 | 5510210 | 0.050 |
18 | 2192645 | 0.049 |
21 | 798435 | 0.048 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.053 | 1045565 | 9 |
0.054 | 3292324 | 10 |
0.055 | 791261 | 7 |
0.056 | 2579035 | 12 |
0.057 | 509484 | 7 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 23/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
IMU (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online