HT
I think a WACC of around 10% is right for OZL, which is essentially their Cost of Equity as they don't currently utilise debt.
Companies with a higher debt/equity ratio generally have a lower WACC, particularly those that engage the low rates on the European bond markets. The cost of debt should also be discounted by the corporate tax rate as it is a tax deductable expense.
Its a valid discussion as you point out the WACC used has a large bearing on the resulting NPV.
I agree with your other metrics used to calculate your $2.17 NPV.
I would buy a stock that is trading at a 35-40% discount to the derived NPV using this method. So for context OZL between $1.30-$1.40 would represent a sufficent discount to its NPV.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- OZL
- big c
big c, page-34
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)