Does anyone honestly believe that a companies performance (measured by share price) is in any way correlated to the quality of postings on Hot Copper? People who elected to hold have lost exactly the same amount of money as they would no matter who was posting, or what the content of the posts are. My own belief is that the postings have been absolutely flawless. I'd much prefer a site where the postings were less brilliant and insightful, but paradoxically holders had a higher share price.
Reaper.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?