Big News, page-142

Haggler2. From what I understand reading through these posts, you called the company yesterday to enquire on progress, you were advised based on where we are in the year it would seem a 6 month delay was possible, I recall the was a possibility due to the wet season being upon us. No one is questioning this.

The issue people have is that you chose to indicate that a 2 year delay was upon us, 2023 was mentioned This is vastly different to a Max 6 month delay which we all realistically expected. This does not indicate a delay to finance which is the real game here.

Your now justifying the your original 3 year delay post as being 100% accurate because of a Max 6 month delay was indicated which is way off the mark.

I think you're being a little mischievous here.