For actual figures Abstract The positive aspirations obtained...

First 250 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kingpins

25,385 Posts.

29

08/01/22

16:30

Post #: 58725875
Share

Originally posted by kingpins ↑

Addressed to Scott the Ratbag
You claim to have medical qualifications and yet you go against medical methods to promote lies to those reading your posts

How many of your other posts are a pack of lies I wonder

It is one thing to have strong personal opinions as those are not regarded as fact, but if done by a trained medical professional which in effect you claim to be, you have to be very clear that you don't agree with the true medical training, one of the problems with this listed pandemic has been the numbers of lies promoted by people who the public had every right to believe they can trust and that includes the medical professionals

So anyone who claims medical qualifications and then posts blatant lies should be banned from posting on HC
for ever in my opinion

The four posts concerned are
58694210
58718237
58712396
58719083

Aspiration refers to the action of pulling back on the plunger for 5 seconds prior to injecting medication (Ipp, Sam, & Parkin, 2006). Current practice in the acute care setting is to aspirate IM injections to check for blood return in the syringe. Lack of blood in the syringe confirms that the needle is in the muscle and not in a blood vessel. If blood is aspirated, remove the needle, discard it appropriately, and re-prepare and administer the medications (Perry et al., 2014). Recent research has found that there is no evidence to support the practice of aspiration, but despite policy changes, the procedure of aspiration continues to be taught and practised (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2014; Greenway, 2014; Sepah, Samad, & Altaf, 2014; Sisson, 2015). Vaccinations and immunizations given by IM injections are never aspirated (Centers for Disease Control, 2015).

https://opentextbc.ca/clinicalskills/chapter/6-8-iv-push-medications-and-saline-lock-flush/

I don't claim to be a medical person and my views are my own and they are supported, where required by reputable medical records

Expand

For actual figures

Abstract
The positive aspirations obtained with a self-aspirating syringe (Astra, Sweden) were compared with those obtained when aspiration was performed manually (Uniject® syringe, Hoechst, West Germany). The subjects were 1186 army recruits, to whom 2348 injections of local anesthetic were given in connection with dental treatment.
When aspiration was performed manually, the results were positive in 4.7% of the cases;

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00016357709055985
Upvote

Reply