Science wouldn't have got very far without peer review. Scientists are least likely to be critical of their own work. All the deluded here have a basis in that for them the peer review process is corrupt, but only for one branch of science - as they would hardly be so concerned about the science of, say for example, the atmosphere of Mars.
But anyway Muzzarati, as you know; it is all a 100 year old socialist experiment for the New World Order with the world's elite scientists complicit with Rothchilds who are ready to take global control. Blah blah, conspiracy madness.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- biggest producer of co2 is not coal
Science wouldn't have got very far without peer review....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)