I am also re-visiting the PFS NPVUnder the presented scenario...

  1. 132 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 31
    I am also re-visiting the PFS NPV

    Under the presented scenario NPV8% for Costa Fuego is $1.2bn with 19% IRR

    I don't however look at this as being the final position
    1. With La Verde and other optimisation/exploration targets this project will hit the target of 150,000 CU TPA per annum over 30 year mine life.
    2. The underground capex will be moved out and I assume year 10
    3. Copper and Gold prices will not go down to PFS assumptions. Copper will be moving to $5/lb while Gold prices will remain well over $3,000/oz and possibly significantly higher
    4. a JV with the likes of a Hudbay (or similar scale) will de-risk and discount factor can be reduced from 8% to 6-7%

    There may well be inflation on both capex cost and opex, but under this type of scenario we are talking about NPV $2.5-$3 billion and IRR over 25%


    Then there is Huasco which i see a reality.This type of joint infrastructure sharing is essential for the mining plans in the area. With a startegic water company and the nature of the asset, water infrastructure discount factor 5-6% would be realistic. The NPV would be driven much much higher


 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
54.0¢
Change
-0.020(3.57%)
Mkt cap ! $81.86M
Open High Low Value Volume
55.5¢ 55.5¢ 53.5¢ $139.2K 256.6K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 88313 54.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
55.0¢ 15261 3
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 13/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
HCH (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.