Without making this a political thread, it is this view that does my head in -
"If we have a policy that starts to tinker with negative gearing, the potential is, even if it's a very sensible policy, even if it's only relatively minor changes, then that will affect confidence as well if both parties are taking that forward."
So a sensible policy that is good for the country is not to be introduced why?
Personally I like Shorten's plan, it encourages new investment, and at the very least has really shone light on a taboo topic.
