Clearly topical.Have another listen to the Podcast. Unless...

Clearly topical.

Have another listen to the Podcast. Unless theres been another explicit announcement Ive not seen, my impression was it was stated Options were preferred over CR (not surprising), not that a CR was impossible. A CEO in this situation would be remiss to outright dismiss CR. I take your point re potential for overstated enthusiasm. A little ironic from yourself though Lux, are you going to hold Trump to sorting out Ukraine in 24hrs? Hypothetically it may not be impossible, neither is the sale of a essentially unique technology that has a consistent track record.

Hence, Id disagree the thought process that CR is an "escape route", its pretty simple strategy really - either we get interest in the tech, we raise to develop tech further or better demonstrate capability tech to hand (ref Caspex) .... or close up and fire sale. I think there may be eyes on the latter. I probably shouldn't but I do ask myself if the like of Footmax are a front for someone "less muddled"? .. possibly a more topical conversation

Qn - Is the continual negative emotive spin by outside the tent keyboard warriors here that gives the "impression" folk online here could achieve better outcomes re management and situation somehow different or better? Given the keyboard warriors here seem not to really understand basics of finance or even the difference betwixt a development stock and one trading profitably - I think any moderation of strategy from BIT is not only more logical but it would be illogical not to see it - they can only lead the horse to water, they cant sign the BP cheque. Obviously we'd like them to work the grey in between.

Big Question - would additional funding demonstrate the trajectory of improvement achieved by BIT 225 in the reporting period continues or further improves these conditions over a longer study?

I suspect we will either see this proposal posed at the AGM or hear more irt to developments of interest OS, obviously maybe both.

GLTA