I agree!
According to the prospectus he was on $355 000 per annum, which he presumably got paid while he was there.
We'll have to wait for any pending court cases to see what other monies allegedly went to other related entities.
I see that today there's another article in the Business News with Timoney spruiking about his so called losses.
How can someone call something a loss if in fact they allegedly didn't pay for it?
I agree! According to the prospectus he was on $355 000 per...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?